In this modern and consumeristic era, a majority of the people have access to devices like computers, mobiles and other gadgets which make our lives easier. People tend to spend time with closed ones online as it an easy and quick way rather than meeting face-to-face. Doing away with physical interactions is not a good sign for the future generation.
There are many reasons contributing to this trend. Firstly, high speed internet connections and electronic devices have made this possible. One can meet his or her beloved by sitting in the comfort of his or her house. Secondly, virtual conferences and meetings are a time saver for many. An interviewee can easily appear for a job interview without having to travel 100 or 1000 kilometres. Thirdly, the younger generation prefer to play video games, do online shopping and order food at their doorsteps.
This trend is deeply impacting the social life. People are feeling closer to each other but they are forgetting the outside world and are glued to these devices. Spending long hours on the screen without any movement may lead to headaches and eye problems. Moreover, people have lost interest in meeting someone in a public place like a restaurant or a shopping complex. In addition to this, many experts believe that this movement could lead to a rise of lonely and introverted people.
All in all, it is quite clear that online interactions has eased the life of many but this development has serious negative outcomes. A proper balance of physical and virtual meetings should be maintained. Humans should keep exploring and not remain confined to a small room.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00367647059 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64474725459 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654411764706 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.2446063075 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.0588235294 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301214457802 0.244688304435 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.076880446253 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585046399752 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160944225427 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706421244737 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.42 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.