People who read for pleasure have better imagination and language skills than those who prefer watching TV. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
Individuals with reading habits for enjoyment have better at imagining and there language skills developed instead whose people how preference lies toward visual media like television. In this easy we are going to discuss how reading have beneficial impact on brain development and on other hand in which ways TV is effecting humans. I totally agree with healthy and impactful consequences of reading and learning.
Some people have particular predilection toward print media rather than electronic visual form of media, which for leisure activities have positive effects on imagination and communicational abilities, While watcher lack it. This is because our brain develop when acquire new knowledge and when its in print form it activate more by imagining the situation and thinking about language, that leads toward better in these skills. When people actively participate in knowledge gather activities new connection brain develops and prevent from age related problems for example Dementia in older people. Because with the growing neurons starts less functional and dead and by such activity can considerably slow down this process by regenerating newer.
While television is also source of information but all thing presented for viewer, therefore people passively sit in front of TV and watch where ever presented. In this process there is no involvement of any kind of self imagination and thinking about possible happening, consumed whatever is aired. Such people more depend on outside views rather than their personal perspective because with passage of time it converted into habit. There learning for language only centered around fewer words used by these media types.
In conclusion, avid readers have superiority over watchers in term of dialect improvement and imaging situations. This is because of younger mind of reader by reading variety of things as pleasure on one hand and better memory on other. While TV user also gain information but only about specific topics without any other advantage. I also agree with this point because reading have proven benefits on personal growth and development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-09 | Farwa Nasir | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 to 2010 Summaries the information and make comparison where possible 61
- The chart below shows the result of a survey about people s habits of tea and coffee buying and drinking in five cities of Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features and make a comparison where possible 73
- Government investment in the arts such as music and theatre is a waste of money Governments must invest this money in public services instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 84
- The graph below shows the injuries that occur at home Summarise the main information by reporting the main features and make comparisons where possible 50
- The chart below shows what anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of anthropologists in five years Summarise the information by reporting the main feature and make a co 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 316, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'activates'?
Suggestion: activates
...knowledge and when its in print form it activate more by imagining the situation and thi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sourced'.
Suggestion: sourced
...ating newer. While television is also source of information but all thing presented ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...its on personal growth and development.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43939393939 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71273736018 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615151515152 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0405761276 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.666666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222887260798 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724585181488 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0537344584719 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138288167391 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483822150647 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.