At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.
Do the advantages of this situation outwieigh the disadvantages?
Recent situation, the huge gap comparative describes the amount of each generation. In fact, adulthood are more dominant while the older are fewer. Varied opinions argue about the impact of existence to their circle. I will explain my personal argument to expose the upside and downside.
First of all, many theories consider about better country are accomplished by productive people. Unquestionably, society have perfectly understood about the age indicator of productive standard. It stands over 25 – 50 years old. In addition, with that circumstance, people get more energy and find it easy to reach logical thinking. For instance, the field of staff to manager or we say the executors are occupied by they are who have a well health. They also in a strong phase to cope the problem and tackle the obstacles. This situation is generally beneficial to dig vast profits in a company.
By the same token, a lot of people would frequently deliver a contribution in diverse context. This is because of higher ability in operating the technology, whereas the the older ordinary set up everything in traditional. Regardless, the younger must not grow the egocentric in themselves. Because they acquired a whole knowledge from the older before. Must be remembered, this also effected some detriments, like the extinction of manner. This behaviour responsible to the young adult habit who thought their seniors are unuseful. However, this issue is able to refuse by persisting the culture habit particularly in respect.
In short, adulthood probably give a great opportunity for the future. This condition are also possible to spread the leadership skill. Forthwith, there would be the immense advantages implicitly rather than the bad side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ty in operating the technology, whereas the the older ordinary set up everything in tra...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ty in operating the technology, whereas the the older ordinary set up everything in tra...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... not grow the egocentric in themselves. Because they acquired a whole knowledge from th...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[4]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'whole knowledge'.
Suggestion: whole knowledge
...ic in themselves. Because they acquired a whole knowledge from the older before. Must be remember...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, so, well, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, in fact, in short, first of all, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29856115108 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91570228375 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665467625899 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.2891792257 49.4020404114 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 70.1428571429 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2380952381 20.7667163134 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.19047619048 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12180489192 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.027742411083 0.084324248473 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0269190894862 0.0667982634062 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591295230508 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229207394949 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.82 50.2224549098 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.57 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.