Professionals like doctors, teachers and lawyers contribute equally to society with non-professionals including entertainers and sportspeople. Thus, they should receive equal pay. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.
In this concurrent world, it is undoubtedly true that everyone has preference to opt occupation which they like. Some people concur that professionals like doctors, engineers, lawyers and teachers contribute similar values to society so, they should receive equal pay as non professionals such as film stars, sport mans and artists. However, I quibble from them and propound that payment of any occupation is totally based on individual handwork, talents and popularity. In this essay I will be cited light on both the controversial notion before a logical conclusion is reached.
Adequate evidences are obtainable to substantiate the concept of equal contribution to professionals. The top-notch concrete reason is that doctors and nurses are crucial members of our society because they always ready to serve their best even days and nights. Another rational reason which hauls me to patron is that teachers are also essential for every individual life. They are first who give us knowledge and helps us to improve our skills as well. But professional skills required only degrees and some trainings which is learned by anyone's easily after some days and nights practice and study.
What is half full for some, may appear half empty to others. So public in general tend to distinguish that non-professionals skills are not easy to learn and everyone cannot have these skills because its comes from only creative minds which has multifarious reasons. To commence with, some people deem that film stars and sportspeople provide amusement to scoiety and also give relaxation. They have some kind of unique mastery which we cannot see in public. They also uphold that people always feel a connection with artists performance because its look real and genuine. Moreover, some time artist act carry a strong good message to society and also encourage people because they are popular in whole nation or world. To uphold my notion I would like to quote an instance of mr. Amir Khan who is rising bollywood star and his movies always bring a good message to society. Here are enough reasons why non professionals earn more money than professionals.
All in All, I reiterate that there are innumerable strong factors supporting to entertainers and sportspeople who get higher payment among teachers, doctors, engineers and many more. However, its contrary can be overlooked. Consequently, I firmly disagree with this statement.
- Some people think that not only should professional sports and cultural enterprises be sponsored by the government but also that amateur adult and children groups should get funding Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support you 84
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 78
- In some countries prisoners are allowed comfortable accommodation good food and healthcare Do you think this is appropriate To what extent do you agree or disagree Give specific reasons and examples to support your position 61
- Some people believe that anyone can create art such as painting poetry music and so on Others think that a person should have special abilities to create art Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Professionals like doctors teachers and lawyers contribute equally to society with non professionals including entertainers and sportspeople Thus they should receive equal pay Do you agree or disagree with this statement Use specific reasons and examples 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'learned', 'learnt'.
Suggestion: learned; learnt
...nly degrees and some trainings which is learn by anyones easily after some days and n...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... easy to learn and everyone cannot have this skills because its comes from only crea...
^^^^
Line 5, column 451, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...f unique mastery which we cannot see in general public. They also uphold that people always fe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, well, in general, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23846153846 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80940586979 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 635.4 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7045898332 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2857142857 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 7.06120827912 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26481802823 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661515800347 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763438344443 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150412383174 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527361057926 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.