In recent decades, the illegal trade in wild animals has become a big problem which has seriously affected parts of the natural environment and mankind itself.
What are some of these negative effects? What can be done to stop the trafficking of wild animals?
Recently, the illegal activity of animal trafficking has become a significant issue which has not only damaged the ecosystem but also human society. This essay will first discuss that the main devastating effect is the loss of biodiversity and then suggest that educating people about the problem is the most effective solution.
The main negative effect of the illegal wildlife trade is the extinction of some particular species which will then disturb the balance of biodiversity in an ecosystem. It can also cause global warming and climate issues as a spiral effect on a global scale. Thus, the impact animal trafficking has on the world and society needs to be taken very seriously. Some animals, such as rhinos, elephants and jaguars, are endangered species in the list of WWF. They are also the target of this threat which will then make them extinct shortly. If the situation continues to happen, and the biodiversity is disturbed, it will accelerate the rising temperature around the world, which will impact every living creature.
In order to tackle this problem, the national government could launch a public campaign to spread knowledge about the importance of biodiversity and how wild species trafficking will alter that. An awareness campaign could shed some light on this situation and persuade people to care more about other living things in nature. Local communities could also be driven to act against the wrongful trade of wild animals. The animal equality campaign is an excellent and successful example which gains public attention and support in many countries to speak out against this criminal threat.
In conclusion, protecting wildlife from traffickers and preventing them from extinction which leads to losing eco-diversity is a major problem the world is facing in recent decades. This problem has many negative impacts on both the environment and humanity. While there is no one-size-fits-all solution, the government should propose a way to spread understanding about the importance of natural preservation and harms of animal trafficking to avoid the progressive destruction of our biosphere to occur.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, thus, while, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1809.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35207100592 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86603330644 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544378698225 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4249599561 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.6 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22312073974 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073346889974 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407144766274 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134224702823 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.011328525363 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.