Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Wealthier countries should accept the skilled migrants from poorer countries for doing the jobs. I highly agree with this as it has so many benefits for both countries.
It is inevitable that the many developed countries are lack of work force at their countries and they intend to hire the employees from poorer countries who are jobless. This bring up the standard of life of the employee. Hiring skilled, educated workforce not only work towards boost the economy of the new country, they earn foreign currencies to enhance the foreign exchange for their country. So this works as a win-win solution for both nations. For instance, the research done at the faculty of international relationships in Colombo university reveals Sri Lanka is receiving 100,000 million rupees from the skilled Sri Lankan migrants who are living in rich countries.
On the other hand, being an employee at a wealthier country supports to strong the relationships between the two countries. When the wealthier country receive high commitment with professional knowledge and skills from third world countries, they intend to invest at the poorer country that benefits too minimize the unemployment there. China Subway international organization has invested 8 billion dollars to India by giving 2000 jobs for Indians. 80% of the labour force in China from other countries, moreover 75% of them from India.
To conclude, the benefits are more by allowing the professional work force from poorer countries to the rich countries. It enhances the good relationship as well as the both countries could able to boost the country’s economy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 301, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to minimize'?
Suggestion: to minimize
...est at the poorer country that benefits too minimize the unemployment there. China Subway in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, third, well, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3166023166 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82476172134 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563706563707 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0173103966 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.923076923 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9230769231 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290498676299 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106348388151 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646689728776 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195029990685 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477639115868 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.