Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?

If job opportunity does not knock, build the door. We should take every opportunity in our lives but sometime our learned skills open the gateways of success. When an affluent nation face the knowledge crunch among there citizens, they allow individuals, who are skillful as well as knowledgeable, to work in there country from different countries especially from poor nations. I tend to agree with this notion because I feel there are certain benefits of this phenomenon. In this essay, I will highlight my point of views and try to provide sound reasoning for my claims.

There are multifarious benefits when rich countries allow people for work from thirld world nations. First and foremost, it broadens the horizons. In other words, when an individual comes from a different country, some unique work culture as well as some new techniques also travel with them. Those affluent nations gain some benefits with these new work cultures, which help to break the knowledge barriers. Additionally, they can use those employees with less weige as compared to there own workers. For instance, in Canada, almost more than 40% Quality Assurance engineers belong to India. Moreover, Canadian government can use them with a minimum salaries as compared to Canadian citizens. Hence, it is really beneficial to rich nations.

Secondly, it can be helpful to mitigate the penury in poor nations. To be precise, when people earn well, they can help their society in order to fight with daily struggles. For example, according to an article published in Times of India, which is a leading Indian newspaper, 80% Indians earns less than 10000 rupees in a month. However, some Indians work in the developed countries such as U.S.A and erans more than enough to help their relatives , who lives in India. Thus, if a rich nations pulls some skillful employees from developing nations, it will be helpful to eliminate this mammoth problem, which is poverty.

Finally, the limitation of skilled labour can be eradicate. Despite of less skillful employees, rich nations can overcome this problem when they invite skilled people from different countries. Furthermore, as those labours will get more salaries as compared to their native nations, they will give their 100% and this will mitigate the knowledge gap. I would like to cite an example. In middle east countries such as Oman and Dubai, there are very less native skillful labours are present and because of this reason they hire knowledgeable people form south asia. Therefore, this benefit cannot be neglected.

To conclude, I would like to reiterate my opinion by saying that, a skillful employee is an asset of any country. Hence, rech countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable labours from poor nations.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: THERE_OWN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'their own'?
Suggestion: their own
...mployees with less weige as compared to there own workers. For instance, in Canada, almos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'salary'?
Suggestion: salary
... government can use them with a minimum salaries as compared to Canadian citizens. Hence...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 397, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: A
... in the developed countries such as U.S.A and erans more than enough to help thei...
^
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...more than enough to help their relatives , who lives in India. Thus, if a rich nat...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, i feel, such as, as well as, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 451.0 315.596192385 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14634146341 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.20363070211 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61400242038 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 235.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521064301552 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 699.3 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 5.43587174349 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9259910804 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2692307692 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3461538462 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42307692308 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275215674785 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0742408239655 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961805645289 0.0667982634062 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183117468769 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0905974889049 0.056905535591 159% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.