Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers, not
people. Why? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
There is a growing recognition that every now and then, cars controlled by intelligent devices are likely to predominate in the future lives instead of driving by human. Below are some explanations for this proficiency and I contend that despite of its benefits, some drawbacks should take deliberately consideration.
In my point, there are some reasons as to why smart cars are expected to gain prevalence in the new age. The first prominent cause for this is that with ceaseless progress of science and technology, the automatic devices related to means of transport have adequate capacity to make away for drivers. It is common in these days that the smart cars may realize warmings or traffic lights, even adhering to traffic regulations. Some trials has been performed and indicate a slight rate of risk in the complicated traffic system as current. The second issue is that fatalities involved to driving careless has been ubiquitous on all the corners of the world. It is urgent that driving by human is no longer the optimal choice in taking part on the traffic. Therefore, citizens in any nation have desire to transform into the automatic cars, aiming to ensure more safety.
This alternative might bring significant consequences on the society and individuals for both sides. On the one hand, positive impacts can be seen in some extents. It is a primary advantage, level of safety may be enhanced by sostiphicated system that was censored and tested strictly before taking in practice. As a result, the number of accidents associated with drunk driving or sleeping driving is able to decrease in the year ahead. On the other hand, converting into smart cars may lead to some adverse effects. Initially, individuals may have insufficient finance to be affordable to such kind of cars due to the exorbitant cost of production. Secondly, a large quality of drivers can be more likely to suffer unemployment. This burden will be bear by the government.
In conclusion, it seems to me that some culprits are attributed to alter human by smart cars in the near future such as advanced technology and careless of people. Furthermore, this tendency have negative and positive impacts for human’s life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: EVERY_NOW_AND_THEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'now and then'.
Suggestion: now and then
There is a growing recognition that every now and then, cars controlled by intelligent devices...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould take deliberately consideration. In my point, there are some reasons as t...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 442, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ing to traffic regulations. Some trials has been performed and indicate a slight ra...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ic cars, aiming to ensure more safety. This alternative might bring significant...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...burden will be bear by the government. In conclusion, it seems to me that some ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, as to, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1851.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05737704918 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87087230483 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 603.0 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1467107069 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4210526316 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2631578947 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52631578947 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124151210013 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0385007896927 0.084324248473 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386145180833 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786096924647 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0399179683766 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.