Sending criminals to prison is the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are a better way to help them. Do you agree or disagree?
Many people claim that governments should provide criminals with education and vocational training instead of putting them into prison. While it is true that education and job training are good methods, I would argue that sending offenders to prison is the best way to punish them.
To begin with, there are some benefits of giving education and job training to criminals. Firstly, due to the low consciousness of legal systems, people who have limited literacy usually offend the law or break the rule. For example, recidivism in Vietnam is high because of the high illiteracy rate. therefore, education is prerequisite for changing petty criminals’ attitude towards family and society. this could help them to reintegrate into society. Secondly, since offenders are usually unemployed and have the desire of earning handsome income rapidly, job training is another essential factor to prevent them from having misbehaviour such as shoplifter or bank robbery. As a result, legislators should provide them vocational training, working experience and hand-ons in order to make them become productive members of society.
However, I believe the most effective way is to send all criminals to prison. First, there are currently an increasing number of serious crimes. For example, in the us, a great number of people have been massacred in shooting raids. therefore, authorities have to isolate violent criminals from society by putting them into jail. this could avoid these people doing harm to innocent civilians. Additionally, governments usually use harsh punishments on serious criminals. For instance, in Singapore, there is death sentence for drug carriers. this could alert a severe warning to people who want to commit crime against humanity. Consequently, people might hesitate to offend a crime in the future.
In conclusion, it is true that governments should give education and job training to criminals, I believe the best method is sending them to prison.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 302, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...gh because of the high illiteracy rate. therefore, education is prerequisite for changing...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 411, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...s; attitude towards family and society. this could help them to reintegrate into soc...
^^^^
Line 11, column 234, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
... have been massacred in shooting raids. therefore, authorities have to isolate violent cr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...from society by putting them into jail. this could avoid these people doing harm to ...
^^^^
Line 11, column 544, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...re is death sentence for drug carriers. this could alert a severe warning to people ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1699.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51623376623 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84666578155 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 525.6 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0273621463 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4210526316 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2105263158 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05263157895 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334101766571 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096421278244 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110788911125 0.0667982634062 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258026526252 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118945387704 0.056905535591 209% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.