Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion
Many people argue that whether government should conserve some languages used by the minority of people or not. In my opinion, I think that these languages should be protected and preserved.
There are some reasons why many people do not agree to protect these languages. Firstly, the small number of people use these languages which are not popular. Therefore, if these languages disappear, which will not affect to community importantly. Instead of this, government might spend public money on transportation, health and education, which brings many benefits for society. Secondly, almost citizens use a popular language in the country, which carries much convenience. For example, it is easy to communicate and share information each other. Moreover, government might save money used for training teachers who teach these languages.
However, it is necessary to conserve several languages. Firstly, government protects these languages as well as customs and culture. Because these languages might contain culture, tradition and some customs of ancient people. If a language disappear, people will lose the rich cultural diversity which make society become boring. As a result, it can negatively impact to young generation who do not deeply know about culture.
In conclusion, I believe that government should spend the small amount of money on protecting several languages, which will carry many benefits in the long term
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ges should be protected and preserved. There are some reasons why many people d...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng teachers who teach these languages. However, it is necessary to conserve sev...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who do not deeply know about culture. In conclusion, I believe that government...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 41.998997996 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.57077625571 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77195653668 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584474885845 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 376.2 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9885307024 49.4020404114 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.3333333333 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323125198626 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111094215045 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638309880375 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206349499758 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323292195559 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.43 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.