Should government makes decisions about people’s lifestyle, or should people make their own decisions?
Whether government intervention in people’s way of living should be encouraged has been a topical issue. While some people express serious concerns and opposition about government regulating their lifestyle, I believe that government’s control regarding personal lifestyle is to some extent necessary for the overall benefit of the community.
The main reason why some people do not support the idea of the government deciding their lifestyle is that they believe government’s interference adversely limit their freedom of choices. Authorities can essentially govern people’s behaviors by the introduction and enforcement of laws and regulations. In some circumstances, these laws would be equal to restrictions and boundaries on people’s personal lifestyle. For example, in Vietnam there have been intense arguments between LGBTQ associations and the government over the acknowledgement of same sex marriage, which is still considered illegal under Vietnam current law systems even though it might seem sensible that voluntary marry is of personal choices of lifestyle.
While I aware of the inherent imperfections of government deciding on individual’s lifestyle, I would argue that these government controls are indisputable. The underlying idea of government’s regulations is to create a civilized and egalitarian society even though it would mean impinging on people’s way of living. For example, without any taxes or limitations on the use of alcohol or cigarettes conducted by the government, many people would choose to consume more of these products and hence the degeneration of overall health of the whole society, not to mention others problems caused by alcohol such as domestic violence or traffic accidents.
To conclude, despite the suffocation that government’s control over people’s decisions in life may cause, these controls are beneficial for the society as a whole
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re beneficial for the society as a whole
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, may, regarding, so, still, while, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1676.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94326241135 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.53318926566 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578014184397 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.1161766865 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.6 106.682146367 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321163482359 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140732212956 0.084324248473 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595259146125 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205511429695 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493120709864 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 17.68 50.2224549098 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.8 11.3001002004 158% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.47 12.4159519038 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.