Should the internet be available to everyone, or should there sometimes be restrictions?
Internet is becoming more important for everybody because it has different information in the world. However, there is an ongoing discussion about whether the internet should be serviceable or it should there sometimes be limitation. This essay will let we know the arguments against and favour about them, concluding we should be available because there are some good information for us.
Firstly, the internet is a big library and has a lot of interesting information. People can always do research the information, lessons or news which usually support in our work, study and life. Moreover, it has good clips for everyone. We can choose other kinds of chanel for us. For example, the cartoon films are in youtube.com where has many exciting videos for children. However, it seems to me that it is important to communicate with other people. There are a few people did not contract us a long time but the social network helps them remember easy about us. Many people argue that they also need use the internet in their lives.
On the contrary, there are plenty of reasons why the internet should there sometimes be restrictions. In here, it has some news, which are not true, are updated in other sites. So the governments should always check them before coming to everyone. However, there are many unreliable websites. For instance, buying online by credit cards is a good idea but we can not receive and do not know quality products. In addition, internet has also negative consequences. Some young students spend more time for playing games online so they effect to their study.
In summary, there are obvious arguments on both sides. Although the internet has plenty of negatives but it is useful for people. We should use careful and bring benefits to us.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92953020134 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60777984932 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536912751678 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.44164709 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.9523809524 106.682146367 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1904761905 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.7619047619 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285309083511 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0811483161625 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131392545139 0.0667982634062 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187429265036 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130890744455 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.72 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.