Some businesses prohibit smoking in any of their offices. Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. Do you agree or disagree that this is the right course of action? Give reasons for your opinion.

Nowadays, some offices have created "Smoking Free Zone" areas, while some government offices have completely made smoking illegal in public areas. Though some people consider it too strict, however as per others it is commendable. From my perspective for an individual's health and surroundings, it should be mandatory not to smoke in public areas.

For instance, smoking causes several side effects, which are injurious to health. it has widely seen that people who smoke regularly have a high probability of developing lung cancer, which is still not entirely curable. The treatment for cancer is very expensive and there is no certainty that the patient will be able to recover. Moreover, people who smoke regularly generally have puffy eyes, bad skin, and the appearance of an unhealthy individual.

In addition to this, smoking does not only affect the individual but also to people who are nearby. This particular phenomenon is called "passive smoking", which has equal chances of causing diseases related to the heart and lungs. In the public area, there are adults, young children, and pregnant women as well. If someone is smoking on the premises, people around that smoking individual also at higher risk. As a result, smoking affects the health of people who are nearby. Additionally, smoking also causes air pollution, which affects our environment as well.

In the nutshell, to reduce the effect of smoking, for people's health and environment, it is advisable that smoking should be prohibited completely from public areas. Government and authorities should encourage people to refrain from smoking and educate them about the harmful sides of smoking.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...commendable. From my perspective for an individuals health and surroundings, it should be m...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...effects, which are injurious to health. it has widely seen that people who smoke r...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, while, for instance, in addition, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1433.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42803030303 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82263567492 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9239616159 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.5333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231932236874 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835065050636 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0383232639925 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147256421124 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372683618376 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.