At present time, an increasing number of people are moving from rural areas towards urban areas for a better life. To accommodate the rising number of population, some cities build multi-storied buildings in small areas, whereas, other cities still building on a wider area. In this essay, I will analyse both views and suggest some relevant solutions as well.
On the first hand, the availability of land is limited due to the size of cities and other factors too; therefore, building taller towers in cities is the only solution to provide shelter to the supremely rising population. Further, the need for land in infrastructure development to provide a convenient life to the residents is also a major task for the authorities. Consider, Tokio as a perfect example for a city whose landmass is limited but the management made for housing and various other infrastructure is an engineering marvel. It seems that currently, there is no other convincing way to tackle the situation than building skyscrapers.
On the other hand, constructing houses on a wider area has its own boundary, first and foremost, it is only possible where the population is under control and enough land is available. As a result, such a pattern of development can be seen in the outskirts of the cities and posh areas of the town. For example, the city of Florida has vast land covered with independent houses, which also shows that if the planning Iis accurate then houses can be built on wider areas also.
To summarise, several problems are caused by improper township planning. I believe that proper understanding of the situations of various cities is very important and building taller towers is one of them and it can very effectively manage the evergrowing demand.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 471, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...then houses can be built on wider areas also. To summarise, several problems are ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, still, then, therefore, well, whereas, as for, as to, for example, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02739726027 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86448805192 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575342465753 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3458628911 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.333333333 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401593674399 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122954004428 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0799352609055 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210868293354 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824336997565 0.056905535591 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.