In some cities people are choosing cars instead of bicycles, while in other cities riding bikes are replacing cars. Why is this the case? Which development do you think is better?
It is true that in many cities citizens prefer to drive car as their daily transport than bicycles, while bikes become the major transport in other cities. There are several reasons behind these selections. In my mind, both cases are not good at all, I will explain why in this essay.
In fact, using motorbikes is popular in almost developing countries. Main reason is that these countries have not enough investment expenditure to develop and expand their infrastructure. Therefore, citizens have a tendency to use bikes as it advanced movement transport in small roads. Meanwhile, in cities of wealthy countries, cars get a largest proportion in vehicles. This is because it has wide road with good transport system. Furthermore, the price of car in these nations is cheap in comparison to their citizens’ income, and then people could be easy to buy even a new car to use as their daily vehicle.
However, as I mentioned above, both of these development are not good for both society and individual. Firstly, using bike is too dangerous, many accidents happened counting by each second. Biking has also bad impact on citizens health because they have to breath under the pollute air condition when they are on road. In contrast, using car as major vehicles put a burden on government investment cost and maintenance cost. In addition, even using cars is more safety than motorbikes but operation fee is higher nowadays due to the restriction of fossil fuels.
In conclusion, selecting which type of vehicles to use as main transport depends on the fortune of its countries. And I believe that neither cars nor bikes are suitable choice for the development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 339, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...n cities of wealthy countries, cars get a largest proportion in vehicles. This is...
^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this development' or 'these developments'?
Suggestion: this development; these developments
... However, as I mentioned above, both of these development are not good for both society and indiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 220, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'citizens'' or 'citizen's'?
Suggestion: citizens'; citizen's
...h second. Biking has also bad impact on citizens health because they have to breath unde...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ealth because they have to breath under the pollute air condition when they are on road. In...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e to the restriction of fossil fuels. In conclusion, selecting which type of veh...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, second, so, then, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01079136691 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79446399794 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4119687573 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0625 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175541626256 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522034992399 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440986348216 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111475011738 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055424857244 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.