Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
There is a controversy that whether students could choose to learn any subject they like, or they have to learn subjects being useful for their future. In my view, this argument could have an agreement between both sides.
On the one hand, people even whom they are always want to learn things which are interested in them. In fact, when students pursue a course, they learn effectively and get many benefits from the course they like. On the other hand, students have tendency to ignore or learn superficially with a subject they really dislike. Therefore, if they have to learn these subjects, it could be waste the time of both students and professors.
However, students maybe do not know what kinds of subjects are useful for them once they graduate and go for work. Sometimes, a subject which they were truant frequently has an important knowledge to them use in the working environment. Thus, a solution which I propose for this situation is that universities should study and give a range of subjects which students have to pass; besides, a couple of courses which students could select to learn at a given credits. Furthermore, in the commencement of each subject, lecturer should outlines the key points of that subject, and then what kind of applications that that subject could bring to. By doing this, students will feel comfortable and learn easily.
In conclusion, by combining between students' hobby subjects and compulsory subjects, universities could offer a best environment study for students.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 51, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'wanted'.
Suggestion: wanted
... hand, people even whom they are always want to learn things which are interested in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 533, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'outline'
Suggestion: outline
...cement of each subject, lecturer should outlines the key points of that subject, and the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 111, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...sory subjects, universities could offer a best environment study for students.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, thus, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, of course, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0438247012 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67562436278 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573705179283 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.753968074 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3333333333 7.06120827912 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288416379389 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114734356678 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507113316876 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179774783226 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0417885708954 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.