Some people believe that a crime is a result of social problems and poverty, others think that crime is a result of bad person’s nature. Discuss both views and give your opinion
There is a controversy that where crime is a result of social issues and poverty or it is come from individual's nature. Each side has their supporting opinions and I think that they are both right with their point of views.
In the one hand, there is a belief that a person's nature determines if they become a criminal or not. Firstly, they argue that an individual who is cruel turns to crime more easy than a kind person. For example, a child bullying others boys or girls at school may turn into a violent criminal in the future. Secondly, bad characteristics such as laziness or selfishness could also breed future offenders who seek to acquire easy money without work for it. A number of youngsters choose to steal of other instead of working hard to make a honest living. There are strong reasons for thinking that those who have an inborn bad nature are more likely to break the law.
In the other hand, social issues and poverty status are also the main causes behind crime. There are various problems in society which might lead to an increase in crime rate. For instance, unemployment pushes people into resorting to crime because they simply can not find a job. At a consequence, the number of offenders has climbed in many countries these recent years. Another reason is that poverty in general leads to rise crime rate. If people do not have enough money for their minimum income standard, they will be tempted to pursue illegal activities just to support themselves and their family.
In conclusion, I argued that both person's nature and social issues and poverty are the primary cause of crimes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
... the one hand, there is a belief that a persons nature determines if they become a crim...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 536, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...f other instead of working hard to make a honest living. There are strong reasons...
^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ily. In conclusion, I argued that both persons nature and social issues and poverty ar...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in general, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72340425532 5.12529762239 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42400723512 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59219858156 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.0974746094 49.4020404114 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.8 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.2 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226315006913 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720241822637 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544455655148 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13898557521 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049880763007 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.0946893788 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.