In some communities, the regulation and control on construction design whiether housing buildings or office buildings are faded. So, people believe they should be free from any restrictions in designing their buildings and houses. I reckon if there were not sufficient and supervised control on structuring buildings by government and authorities, this will cause more destructive consequences given the rationales mentioned below.
On the one hand, it is proven that constructing buildings in diverse regions is different based on several parameters. First of all, the weather is a measurement factor in the type of materials, structures, and design that local constructions should have. By way of illustration, if people use wood as a primary material in cunstructing building when the local weather is cold and rainy in the majority months of the years, it will cause severe economy burdon on owner at first and the society as a whole given overuse of resources for maintenance and renovation.
Furthermore, due to ethical reasons there should be some particular regulations in designing external appearance of buildings. In a society there are individuals with various attitudes, believes and religions. It is feasible that a token in a household has had a bad massage for another, so they should avoid apply these sorts of personal desires in external design of their buildings. Meanwhile, there are different and must-be types of structures in any city, such as hospitals, banks, office buildings and so on. Because they provide similar services in all over the world, they should pursue the international and typical architecture framework when they design these facilities.
In conclusion, although some individuals believe that there should not be any restrictions in design of buildings, and unfortunately, many towns underestimate the vital role of constructing based on regional factors and nature. I am convinced that this trend will cause more detrimental effects than constructive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trimental effects than constructive.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, so, while, i reckon, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1697.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49190938511 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16870292866 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572815533981 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6941113118 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.538461538 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7692307692 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18720278747 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713982751747 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0652813264574 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121395050997 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691051869572 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.73 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.