Some companies use major sports events for promoting their products. Some people believe that it has negative effects on sports. Do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, sport is crucial for the development of regions as it provides name, fame, respect as well to their nations. However, a majority of industries expand on sports ceremonies to advert their products. Whilst, a vast number of humans deems that it spread negative effects on sport fields. I agree with this perception because it is causing of match fixing, batting and giving wrong information about products to public by using famous sportsmen.
The main reason to support this notion is that a company which choose a one team to promote their products during sport events and spend a huge amount of wealth on it so that is why they fixed matches with teams to earn more money. In addition to this, the industries give greed of money to the players as well as a couple of sportsmen are greedy and always rat running behind wealth so they agree to play games according fixings. Even though, some people batting on matches because they have knowledge about the matches have fixed and which players is performing, what is happening in this game and these factors are perilous for games as well as country’s reputations. For example, a team of Rajasthan Royal is not permitted to playing in IPL ( Indian premium league) matches as they get out from games due to match fixing and batting by famous actor Bindu Dara Singh, cricket player Srikanth which sent to prison for this by ICC( Indian cricket council).
The another major factor to take stand of this prospective is that industries select these ceremonies for advertising of their products as companies well-known that public blindly following their favourite sport personalities and audiences have often influence by them. Moreover, if public liked sportsmen advert these products than a drastic increase can be seen in the sales of products. Similarly, it is bed for public because industries not provide real information about products. On the other hand, the wealth inclines dramatically in company’s lockers because they sell their products by using popular players as well as wrong information to customers. Apart from that, company have not any meaning about customers feeling, choices and money as their main aim to earn a vast amount of money so that is why they use these manners to sell products. For instance, ultra tech cement industry have paid wealth to hire team Channi super kings to promote their products because the captain of team is Mahinder Singh Dhoni which liked by huge number of public.
In conclusion, although companies spend money on sports events to advertising their products which beneficial for regime’s economy and sport fields but it has lots of dark sides such as match fixing, batting and misused sport celebrities to attract customers for selling their products which not only detrimental for public but also their income.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 750, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Royal is not permitted to playing in IPL Indian premium league matches as they ge...
^^
Line 9, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wing their favourite sport personalities and audiences have often influence by th...
^^
Line 9, column 253, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'influenced'.
Suggestion: influenced
...personalities and audiences have often influence by them. Moreover, if public liked spor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1615.20841683 147% => OK
No of words: 468.0 315.596192385 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08333333333 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60344023399 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49358974359 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 700.2 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.2255133724 49.4020404114 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.6 106.682146367 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2 20.7667163134 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238361684407 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087532911808 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455220763073 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161936799045 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387344241012 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.0946893788 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.