some company think the best way to motivate and encourage worker to work hard is to pay them how much they produce and sell. do you agree or disagree? include any relevant examples based on your knowledge and experience.
Nowadays, our society believe that it is important to increase employees to make higher productivity and sell volume, the company should pay by quantity of produce and selling rates. I completely agree with this statement it brings more advantage rather than disadvantage for some reasons.
In the one hand, the main benefit of this problem is to make people give the best work and suggest to make progression career. It is because, people will have planed to make their quality of work higher than before. For an example, many companies give bonus or salary rises to their workers that is can make the workers have job satisfaction, such as much manufacture company in south Korea. As a result, south Korea has a great dramatically rise their product and have many incomes to the company and give wealth to their nation from large productivity.
In the other hand, several companies used hard financial regulation for workers. However, it makes many labors lazy to make progression, because they only paid for their salary. For an next example, UK has a great company produce which paid labor just for their job, not for their spirit. Finally, it makes many union been on strike in UK to protest the company, it is bad and will ruin company and nation productivity.
To sum up, from where I stand it is already clear that is gives more merit that the demerit. I believe that the company should give more paying system to pay the workers by how much they make product and sells.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...se they only paid for their salary. For an next example, UK has a great company pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, so, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1225.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76653696498 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46772992586 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548638132296 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9266862388 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.083333333 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41666666667 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144335180361 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059542440318 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522367275723 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099874485914 0.151304729494 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302942681192 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.