Some countries are spending a lot of money on making bicycle friendly cities. Why is this. and what solution is best for transportation problems.
The last few decades have seen enormous changes in the way of people's lives are affected by the bad environment. There are many problems are growing due to the pollution. Most countries are spending more money on making bicycles and track in order to save their humans life. This has become a trend which is rising especially in European countries. This essay will discuss the reasons why this phenomenon is occurring, and offer some solutions.
From an overall perspective, perhaps the most compelling reason why nations are spending too much money on making bicycles is because it is beneficial for individuals healt. This mean that these days In the era of modernization, If people have bicycles, they might lose their body weight and also avoid the problem of obesity. For instance, A recent research concluded that 65% of masses who live in Italy, they use more bicycle when they go outside for purchasing household products. A further point of this idea could be that If more people purchase bicycles, pollution would not go up in short period of time.
However, there are various possible solutions. Firstly, government should ban bad vehicles which release toxic fumes in to the clean air. As a result, Many illnesses like as Asthma and lung cancer might not increase steadily. Secondly, growing the price rates of fuel, less individuals will use motor vehicles. The decision as to whether individuals should use bicycle in order to keep fit and healthy body must be seen in the context of entire society.
To conclude,Although This is a topic which is very relevant to the contemporary society. However I believe the best solution is that authorities should build new infrastructure for driving bicycles. Unless individuals use motor vehicles, pollution problems could be solved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 598, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...les, pollution would not go up in short period of time. However, there are various pos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 270, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun individuals is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ondly, growing the price rates of fuel, less individuals will use motor vehicles. Th...
^^^^
Line 10, column 325, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...s will use motor vehicles. The decision as to whether individuals should use bicycle in order...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 12, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , Although
...ext of entire society. To conclude,Although This is a topic which is very relevant ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 90, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...y relevant to the contemporary society. However I believe the best solution is that aut...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, for instance, in short, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15646258503 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75801475327 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.8044462816 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.1764705882 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2941176471 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.82352941176 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238162548055 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0620947941212 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647879354265 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134800470484 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772685011548 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.