In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Currently, the consumption of convenience food in several nations is leading to numerous health problems. Consequently, to limit this case, authorities should levy a higher tax on this type of food. Personally, I totally disagree with this statement because of the rationale following.
First of all, it can be clearly seen that the fast food industry is one of the sources that contribute a massive amount of money to the national economy. To illustrate, due to the quick pace of life, people tend to have more frozen food; therefore, the number of products can be significantly purchased every day, which brings in substantial profits for manufacturers and governments. Moreover, the higher the demand is, the more food needs to be produced. This will create employment opportunities for lots of people to work in factories and produce goods for the public, thereby solving the unemployment problem. If policymakers impose a higher tax, it may impact adversely on the economy. Due to the increase in the price of canned food, the selling will decrease, leading to the scenario that ready meals are difficult to sell. As a result, the effort to try to tackle the current issue will definitely lead to a bigger one.
Furthermore, imposing a higher tax can beget some unpleasant situations. To explain, if associations want to generate a high income while paying taxes, they will cut off some stages of the food process to reduce the production cost. For example, companies will not include the sterilized process, which is the most expensive one to invest, or they will import uncleaned food, which will considerably harm customers’ health after eating them. Hence, the original purpose of putting a higher tax cannot be fulfilled in view of a completely opposite result.
In conclusion, imposing a higher tax seems to be ineffective to solve the growing predicament as it brings about numerous disadvantages. However, there are a few measures that governments could take instead, such as raising the awareness of individuals about the detrimental effects of eating too much junk food and launching advertising campaigns or programs that include scientists and doctors to instruct everyone to lead a healthy lifestyle.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 359.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21727019499 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97182241962 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601671309192 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5490706069 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0625 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4375 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4375 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294434604287 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889258675516 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0316032687333 0.0667982634062 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16639178255 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251306523707 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.