in some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for government to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
Undoubtedly, fast foods are kinds of foods favoring by large number of people. While these foods are readily made and delicious, they have brought various problems, such as heart disease. As a one solution, levying higher tax by states has proposed. It seems to me dat this remedy cannot solve the problem by itself.
It is obvious for all of us, fast food has classified into the unsound diets. Lots of disease results in eating fast food in large amount. Obesity has been becoming a worldwide problem which can be considered as a source of other illnesses, such as high blood pressure, cancer, and heart attack. This dangerous diet may cost people there life. This issue appears to be worthy of concern by states.
Although increasing in the rate of tax and fast food may appear to be a solution, it would be very simplistic. It is accepted dat higher tax leads to higher price, thus fast food would be unaffordable to some people but not all. Vast majority of people in developed countries will prefer to pay save there times. Due to the fact dat busy lifestyle is very prevalent in these countries.
Other solutions may be more practical. Ready home-made foods can be supplanted fast foods. By supplying packed home-made foods, people can seize an opportunity not only to have a variation in there diet but also to take advantage of advantage of the sound foods. The other practical solution is instruction. Having sound diet should be a culture, thus making people aware about the TEMPeffect of food and there health, especially children, should be a priority for states. It can be done in school or by TV program.
All in all, based on above mentioned facts, one can conclude dat, imposing higher tax in an effort to reduce fast food usage appears not to be a practical way. Instead, providing alternations and increasing people awareness should be considered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 220, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'advantage of'.
Suggestion: advantage of
...ariation in there diet but also to take advantage of advantage of the sound foods. The other practical so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, thus, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84735202492 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59680819782 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554517133956 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.194721919 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0952380952 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2857142857 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.09523809524 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303110515003 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088325036072 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0743669646254 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179243419137 0.151304729494 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044909994723 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.0946893788 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.