In some countries, more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history the house or building they live in
What are the reasons for this?
How can people research this?
Nowadays, in some nations, there have been increases in the number of people stimulated by the origins and the formation of their current accommodations. This essay is going to discuss some rationales together with some methods of people doing so.
There are some reasonable justifications explaining why people be enthusiastic and curious about the history of their houses. First of all, it is mainly for the people’s security purposes. Knowing more about your shelters makes you feel more active when some potential abrupt circumstances are happening over. To cite an example, whenever a fire happens inside your house, your knowledge of the house’s construction and modelings will be a precious life-saver for both you and your family. In addition, another acceptable reason can be put on people’s religious willingness to obtain deep knowledge and awareness of where they are living. In some cultures, many religious believers and practitioners often take the houses’ designs and origins into consideration. Many believe these aspects will affect their prosperity and stability in life. For instance, it is a common thought in some Asian countries that the smooth process of building up a house will fore-tell about a proper life with few uncertainties.
There are some ways for people to know more about their shelters. One apparent method of doing so is asking the architect and the building unit of the house. It will never be easier to have more information about your house than to directly interrogate its constructors. Nonetheless, asking the neighborhoods is also a good approach when it comes to the origins of the land and the surrounding areas.
This essay explained why people feel interested in knowing about their houses and discuss several methods to do so. While the justifications are mostly related to security purposes and superstitious beliefs, the techniques of that are through diplomacy and communications with neighbors and house planners.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nonetheless, so, thus, while, for instance, in addition, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34935897436 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01189122329 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3793371229 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.3125 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329979257637 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105503795809 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0770732108485 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188762230729 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379736035476 0.056905535591 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.