In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think it is a positive or negative situation

Having an owned house instead of a rent one is of great importance for people in some countries. In my opinion, this is a negative situation that may bring up some social problems.

There are serval reasons for this situation. First, the price of the house is not too expensive in some countries, especially developing ones. People who have rented their houses for a long time may find out that they have paid much the same amount of money to buy one. Hence, buying a house instead of renting one is more economical for them. Another reason is that owning a home in some nations has additional benefits while renting one can not possess. For example, in China, having a home near prestigious schools allows the owner's children to attend these schools, which is an invaluable advantage. Finally, it makes people feel a sense of safety and belonging to have their own houses. They need not worry about the rent and can do almost whatever they want with their home, like decorating and renovating.

However, this situation is not positive due to the social problems it may cause. While the price of the house may be low in some nations, people still need to pay a considerable amount of money to own one. This reduces people's disposable income, which can be spent on clothes, food, and other things they want. Moreover, the additional benefit bond to a house increases the inequality between the rich and the poor.

To summarize, while people in some countries prefer owning a home rather than renting one due to some benefits, I consider this situation negative as it brings more economic and social problems.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, may, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79569892473 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47564153654 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 427.5 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7223961189 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326491122145 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110839535514 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0777652727831 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234623641883 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0678934060141 0.056905535591 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.