In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today’s world?
It has always been a controversial issue over whether the general education or specific education is deemed more suitable for secondary students. While people argue that the latter alternative would be better for students, I firmly believe that both are required in children’s development.
There is no denying the fact that they have access to a wide range of field would be more beneficial for them in many different ways. Students can grasp an overall of understanding of various aspects and develop personal skill. This is necessary for teenagers to deal with a multitude of problems they might encounter in their daily life. For instance, Mathematical calculation would come to the rescue in case of totaling the bills; Chemistry would be a huge assistance if you purchase drugs at a pharmaceutical store; malfunctioning electrical appliances due to the ignorance of fundamental knowledge of Physics could be quite unsettling; momentous events happening in overseas countries are often considered good conversation and they need to cultivate his English or France. Additionally, education curricula with multiform of subjects help students to have more opportunities to determine their career passion. Hence, it is somehow necessary for children to be taught many subjects in their early stage of schooling.
As children grow up, specific education on learning one or two particular subjects is more useful for them to some extent. This is simply due to the fact that this is the best choice because it would facilitate secondary students’ future career preparation. A training program will allow students to nurture in-depth knowledge and skills in the occupation they set their hearts on, paving a way for major professional advances. The job available in today’s world increasingly demands job seekers in one particular skill. In the current overwhelming competitive labor market, having a deeper insight into one sphere will make you stand out from other applicants. Furthermore, strongly focusing on profession-oriented modules can maximize students’ effort and time.
In conclusion, both general and specific education play equally important roles in children’s various stage of their life. It is reasonable to take advantage of both educational systems so as to develop their potential competency to the fullest.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | Heng Sophat | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-15 | rednivaralat | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | minoomrd | 61 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | namra | 73 | view |
- In some countries, secondary schools aim to provide a general education across a range of subjects. In others, children focus on a narrow range of subjects related to a particular career. Which of these two systems is more appropriate in today's worl 84
- Computers are increasingly used in education. In which areas do you think are computers more important and in which areas are teachers more important?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 89
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to write in newspapers. What factors influence these decisions? Do you think we become used to bad news? Should more good news be reported? 73
- The unlimited use of cars cause many problems. What are those problems ? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people ro use cars ? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ld would be more beneficial for them in many different ways. Students can grasp an overall of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...e advantage of both educational systems so as to develop their potential competency to t...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, second, so, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2001.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55833333333 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23172807613 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611111111111 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.2765280512 49.4020404114 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0625 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8125 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180180781952 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611961142498 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534492465503 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110065377478 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301694597589 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.