In some countries, small town-centre shops are going out of business because people tend to drive to large out-of-town stores. As a result, people without cars have limited access to out-of town stores, and it may result in an increase in the use of cars. Do you think the disadvantages of this change outweigh its advantages?
Nowadays, with industrialization and socialization countries which support a part of increasing of large stores in the center city such as supermarket which replaces for small shops. This trend leads to increasing cars due to the movement to large shops. I believe that this trend to bring some disadvantages and benefits to the country.
In these days, I think that small stores are replaced by large stores in the center city that have some impact on the environment because of some reasons. First of all, in some village have a small store which has higher prices than large store and these places do not have enough products to offer for people. As a result, people have to buy a car, and they try to drive their cars to the supermarket in the center of the city. Consequently, this trend will increase the number of private vehicles, and increase the emission into the air.
In addition, some organized open a supermarket in the central city which prepares plenty of products with many prices vary. People do not need to buy the products at high cost at the small stores. Meanwhile, large shops supply good services for people such as customers can exchange their product if this product is crack or out of date. Thus, the government is often unmanageable and collect taxes from scattered small shops. Therefore, a small shop cannot help financial of local government and small business do not have a wide appeal to people.
In conclusion, although businesses open large shops in the central city and people tend to drive to large shops, people do not have a car, they can not access to large shops in the central city because of some reason I wrote above. Thus, I believe that there are some disadvantages and advantages of the current trend.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80858085809 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61431139241 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471947194719 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0785477001 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.071428571 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256881414056 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850050912823 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611736744712 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159465736177 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525001835195 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.