Notion of taking a break for work or travel in between secondary school and graduation is supported in many countries. Certainly it has some benefit but at the same time has some negative too. In this essay, both the pros and cons of this idea are discussed.
Taking a break after completing 10 to 12 years of schooling gives some time to students which they can utilise for work or travel. While working, young people get insight of real work life they would face after graduation. At the same time, they could earn and save money to support their further studies. That not only gives sense of responsibility to adolescents, but some financial relief to their guardians. Students opting for travel break get benefitted too as travelling enriches their overall knowledge and gives broader perspective. They would be able to learn about history, local art, geography and many more subjects. Travelling also help students to introspect and learn about their true areas of interest and subsequently they can elect them as their major while in university. Considering above facts, we can certainly say that taking a break is surely beneficial in many ways.
However, there are certain valid arguments in support of a view of continuing education without any break. Firstly, taking off in between schooling and graduation may distract adolescents; in certain cases, they may lose focus due to work or travel. Lastly, a country promoting educational break as practice, might delay the readiness of the workforce of nation. In such case, there can be long term adverse impact on social and economical indicators. So, we need to be mindful of adopting a culture of work or travel break during studies
To summarise, young people should thoroughly consider all positives and negatives and based on what is most suitable to them, they should take decision of break.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... long term adverse impact on social and economical indicators. So, we need to be mindful o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, may, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06818181818 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66343618452 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4279216058 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5625 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195439007986 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625086170222 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0643788393282 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124457988546 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055720345568 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.