Nowadays, employing special trainees for taking care of senior citizens has become a popular trend. It seems to be a positive development owning to many advantages of it.
To begin with, appointing caretakers offers many benefits to young people. Firstly, it allows them to work round o'clock without the tensions of caring of their parents. Secondly, such professionals are well organised at their work as they are provided special training for this purpose. They give old people a good company and elderly people do not feel lonely with them.
Moreover, these caretakers are proven good at their work. They never forget the tasks they have to do such as giving medicines and other. They can perform their duties well effectively and efficiently and prove themselves life saviour in emergency situations. What's more, some work at this post with low pay and flexible hours which of course beneficial for youngsters to employ them for taking care of their elders.
From upper mentioned facts one can conclude that appointing professionals for caring of seniors is beneficial to both youngsters and their elders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 48, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s, employing special trainees for taking care of senior citizens has become a pop...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pment owning to many advantages of it. To begin with, appointing caretakers off...
^^^
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: o'clock
.... Firstly, it allows them to work round oclock without the tensions of caring of their...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: What's
...s life saviour in emergency situations. Whats more, some work at this post with low p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, of course, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 1615.20841683 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 180.0 315.596192385 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22777777778 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 4.20363070211 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63201443765 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 176.041082164 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.655555555556 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 506.74238477 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.3796909108 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.5454545455 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3636363636 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283326096848 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0960001120092 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417757120833 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164168246981 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308700342469 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.