Some employers offer their employees subsidised membership of gyms and sports clubs, believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.
There is a fact that subsidizing clubs and gyms membership can enhance the workforce's wellness, and therefore they will be more productive at work. However, some might argue that this issue does not contain any positive effects. In this essay, arguments of both sides of this polemical topic will be analyzed before reaching a concluding point.
On the one hand, those who are in favor of this subject express their viewpoints cogently. The cardinal reason behind their unwavering support is that as people and even especially workers start to working out regularly, they become healthier. By this I mean that while the staff is fit, they feel less stressed and more contented, directly contributing to higher levels of output and services. Furthermore, it seems that including some leisure time might ameliorate the work/life balance of the employees, which is more motivational than financial rewards such as bonus or incentives. Finally, feeling healthier appears to result in job satisfaction which is itself a motivating factor.
By stark contrast, the problem with this topic is that sometimes it can be challenging to measure the effectiveness of them. Hence, the opponents represent other dominant roots ranging from on the job training and day release programs as underlying factors of effectiveness. For instance, throughout training time on the job, workers can progress on their career. Moreover, by spending the entire day out of work, they might stay away from workplace pressure and have better job prospects. So, allocating a specific amount of funds on these activities tends to improve work quality.
In conclusion, it is logical to state that even though subsidizing sports clubs can be beneficial to increase the quality of work, other criteria such as on the job training and day release programs need to be taken into account.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workforces'' or 'workforce's'?
Suggestion: workforces'; workforce's
...ubs and gyms membership can enhance the workforces wellness, and therefore they will be mo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'measuring'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: measuring
...is that sometimes it can be challenging to measure the effectiveness of them. Hence, the o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1561.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25589225589 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80704306253 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.8479010527 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2142857143 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21428571429 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20643311488 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644858427314 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293621626409 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114384706545 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467364902923 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.