The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Given are two maps comparing changes in road access to a hospital in a city in the years 2007 and 2010.

A brief analysis of the figures reveals some striking alternations to the area of the city hospital, involving creating new facilities for the convenience of citizens and hospital staff as well.

The first significant change has been made in hospital road, creating two roundabouts in starting and ending points of the way, one of them at the intersection of city road and hospital road, the other one at the junction of hospital and city road.

Regarding bus stops which were situated either side of the hospital road in 2007, a new site has been allocated to the bus station between hospital and city road after construction in 2010. Besides, this new amenity has access to both roundabouts.

In 2007, staff and the public used to park their cars on the same site. However, this zone was given to the staff car park in 2010. Additionally, the public can leave their devices in the area in proximity to the hospital from the right side.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, however, if, regarding, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71195652174 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55593729455 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527173913043 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.5193259371 43.030603864 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266210632756 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116324161429 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108497843578 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165996805812 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110981550359 0.0819641961636 135% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.