Some employers reward good performance with financial incentives Are such incentives enough to encourage employees to be more productive Do you think such rewards could also have a negative impact

Essay topics:

Some employers reward good performance with financial incentives. Are such incentives enough to encourage employees to be more productive? Do you think such rewards could also have a negative impact?

In any organization for achieving goal management committee always encourage their employee. There are several ways to encourage employee such as best employee year awards, promotion, incentives. In my opinion it's hold positive impact on employee. Knowing ability of employee and encourage them it all together leads to success of any organization.

Best Strategy for encouraging employee giving them incentives as per their hard work. Organization have to have look on performance of employee and on that analysis they gives incentives. Employee who really serious about his work, more attentive in any project benefited from this activity. While considering profit organization also need to consider employee requirement, because after all they have some responsiblity towards their family.

It's not only beneficial for employee but also for organization. Employee more focusly and sincerely work in any task. Most importantly bond between organization and employee getting strong. They work in different way, come up with ideas, solution for any issue. In certain cases, employee are aligned in such way that they work for continuously without breaking.

Coin has always two sides, in similar way while there are also negative impact among employees. They have jealousy amongs each other on discussion on incentive distribution. It's fact that, organization can't distribute the same incentive to each employee, it may vary as per performance.

In some cases, employee has negative mind set so even though he good at his work but intentionally he made delay while submission of alloted work. It not only affected organization growth, it also affected on his future career. It's one kind negative impact which to be reflected on employee mind.

In conclusion, it's hold always positive impact giving incentive for encouragement of employee but there are also negative impact. It's depends upon mindset of employee, how they works together and are they serious about there work.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Best'.
Suggestion: The Best
...eads to success of any organization. Best Strategy for encouraging employee givin...
^^^^
Line 3, column 171, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'give'
Suggestion: give
...e of employee and on that analysis they gives incentives. Employee who really serious...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n and employee getting strong. They work in different way, come up with ideas, so...
^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...stribution. Its fact that, organization cant distribute the same incentive to each e...
^^^^
Line 11, column 178, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'work'
Suggestion: work
...ends upon mindset of employee, how they works together and are they serious about the...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, really, so, while, after all, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in some cases

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1684.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50326797386 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89202207876 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1993924217 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.1904761905 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5714285714 20.7667163134 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233107159415 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768016375953 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505979547552 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12954274528 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0190459303329 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.