Some employers want to be able to contact their staff at all times, even on holidays. Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages?
Career prospects in the modern world have changed drastically, where today management expects their team to be available every day, holidays being no exception. While a few dedicated and satisfied employees find this a chance to showcase their abilities and talents, it is not everybody’s cup of tea to be completely involved in work outside office hours.
The employer expects his staff to get the work done within the stipulated time, as he expects his team to execute the task at hand. They try to extract their money’s worth from their employees. A logical extension of this is a boss expecting at least 2 million dollars in revenue when he is paying his head of Sales a million dollar salary. The primary reason for this is the cut throat competition in today’s world, not leaving much of choice in the hands of the people in-charge. This has in-turn lead to an environment where the team is expected to be available whenever needed.
Firstly, this arrangement reduces the management’s stress of finding the right people at all times, even if it comes at the cost of employees’ personal time. Research has already shown that such type of system is not only stressful for the employees, but also harmful for the employer in the long run as the attrition rate increases. Secondly, even though the team is paid to execute the work, it doesn’t mean that the boss owns all their time. Employees that are left to decide how to manage their work and spare time on their own, have shown much better productivity than a team that has been constantly bossed around. Lastly, overworked individual finds it demotivating to work for the same company as the time passes.
In conclusion, the disadvantages in expecting one’s staff to be in contact even during vacations and off work hours eclipse the advantages. Highly productive less stressful and employees emerge when they have independence on the timeline, in executing their job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n the timeline, in executing their job.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, while, at least, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1645.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03058103976 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9009916423 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584097859327 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7498348256 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3571428571 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221774849982 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075880771911 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434024975676 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138270252313 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0199637639607 0.056905535591 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.