Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
The way we socialise has been drastically changed by technology. It has been an intricate tool shaping modern-day relationships, helping people to make healthier and meaningful relationships, by connecting us to like-minded people instantly. This most certainly is a step in the right direction.
On one the hand, technology has reached every aspect of our lives, causing some to be addicted to it. To illustrate, some people find it much more pleasing to have an online communication than go out and have an actual conversation with their friends. In addition, social media platforms like Facebook, Instagram and, Snapchat have all made people to out-do their peers and project themselves as superior. For instance, many teenagers want to engage in risk seeking activities like hanging on a high-rise crane just to post videos of it and become popular among their group. Therefore, technology does have some negative impact, by making people addicted and providing a negative influence.
On the other hand, the progress in the kind of relationships people now have due to technology cannot be ignored. If it wasn’t for real-time communication via video or audio, couples living miles apart would have faced many difficulties. For example, it isn’t tedious to Skype call someone, have a conversation with them almost as if they are present with you. Moreover, technology has helped many couples find one another even when they didn’t reside in the same country. For instance, a girl in the USA found her soulmate in a boy, who was a citizen of the U.K. because they both were members of cat lovers group on Facebook.
In conclusion, technology has made some negative influence along with a few being addicted to it, but the impact it has created by aiding people to connect with people all around the globe and understand each other far outweighs its negatives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1581.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14983713355 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91277344978 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.926738466 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.928571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.21428571429 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263504676772 0.244688304435 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833709729683 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617797315875 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155658551106 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0338813300875 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.