Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make?
Has this become a positive or negative development?
Technological advancement in communication has tremendously changed the way people interact and make relationship with others. Although there are few good sides of it, I think it has damaging negative impacts on the society.
With the emergence of technology oriented networking, popularly known as social networking, people has now become less social than they were in the past. Previously our parents used to interact more even in smaller social events such as birth of a child or wedding ceremony of some distant relative. They would usually gather in case of any accidents or any bad news of relatives or friends nearly every time. But today even for the burials, sometimes we try to escape from attending and send a condolence message instead, thanks to various messaging technologies.
Also, rather than reinforcing relationship with real-life friends and relatives, nowadays people, especially juveniles, are being more prone to making virtual relationship with someone who they are very unlikely to meet with in their lifetime.
The effect of so much dependency on technology for making or maintaining relationship has dire consequences. It is making us and our upcoming generations more and more unsocial. Moreover, while interacting with a virtual person who I don't know very well, I am taking risk of being exposed or even being blackmailed since the proof of my interaction with my virtual friend through these channels are immutable most of the times.
Therefore, it is a dangerous consequence we are up to and if timely and proper measures were not taken, it might do greater damage to our future generations and the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...though there are few good sides of it, I think it has damaging negative impacts o...
^^
Line 13, column 235, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...interacting with a virtual person who I dont know very well, I am taking risk of bei...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31060606061 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97193792999 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632575757576 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.2935090408 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21045221678 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0792673267201 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107103888384 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118180918732 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0971911487324 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.