Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
The trend of adding a foreign language in school syllabus has certainly increased since past few years over the world. Some experts opine that learning a foreign language in primary school is more beneficial than in a secondary school. I believe that acquiring knowledge of a new language has more disadvantages.
Firstly, children are more enthusiastic about learning new things and are always open to new ideas. The grasping power is also excellent at younger age due to which the pupil tends to learn more quicker than an adult. Also, students of international school who learn new languages in early stages have upper hand over the local school Student while securing admissions for higher studies as the institute might consider students who can speak or write the preferred language.
However, studying a new language at primary level could increase workload on individual. They might have to attend extra classes and this would add some more assignments to their regular ones which may become hectic for them. Considering the fact that in international schools each subject is taught by different teachers, the schools in native areas won't be able to provide such facilities to students. One teacher covers all subjects, so they are not well trained and even the language competency is uncertain. In addition, it is stressful for child be bilingual. Such children have difficulty in deciding which language to speak, either foreign language or mother tongue, and may end up learning nothing.
In conclusion, it is clear that learning a new language as early as possible has merits, but a wrong approach of teachers and parents will produce more counterproductive impacts.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'quicker' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: quicker
...e due to which the pupil tends to learn more quicker than an adult. Also, students of intern...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 95, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e as early as possible has merits, but a wrong approach of teachers and parents w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20588235294 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77388183152 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628676470588 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8103563035 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324562921467 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114133793691 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108527729491 0.0667982634062 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193885431339 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112112527272 0.056905535591 197% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.