Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Essay topics:

Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

Without a doubt, studying foreign languages is the key that has promoted global understanding. And some people agree that it is more effective if children start learning a second language at primary school instead of secondary school. I strongly believe with this assertion.

First of all, many research studies have shown that young children learn languages more rapidly and easily than adolescents. If adults make interest in languages for children from foreign songs, cartoon movies of fairy tales, they will enjoy this language. For example, I have had self- verification from my elder brothers. Nam, the first kid of my uncle’s family follows learning process of his school that started studying English at secondary school and at present time, his second language is at intermediate level. In comparison, his elder brother loves Walt Disney cartoon series, then began learning English when he was still 6 years old. Now, the elder one can speak fluently and confidently this language like his mother tongue.

In addition, children at adolescent ages usually feel shy to pronounce a new language as they could be taken a joke from their classmates, while brains of children at primary school are programmed to effectively receive the second language. Moreover, teenagers need to spend more time on studying many difficult subjects including math, chemistry, physics. It caused to dedicate time for learning English. In comparison with children at adolescent, young children have only concentrated on two main subjects, that are math and literature. Consequently, they have much time for studying their favorite subjects like English.

To conclude, it is true that learning foreign language in primary school is more effective than secondary school.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Without a doubt, studying foreign langua...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trongly believe with this assertion. First of all, many research studies have...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is language like his mother tongue. In addition, children at adolescent ages...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 373, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dedicating'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: dedicating
...ing math, chemistry, physics. It caused to dedicate time for learning English. In compariso...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 415, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
... dedicate time for learning English. In comparison with children at adolescent, young chil...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir favorite subjects like English. To conclude, it is true that learning fo...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, if, moreover, second, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, first of all, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.43636363636 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7416927871 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592727272727 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.848096217 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365754553734 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125945866446 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111690806775 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.285988497492 0.151304729494 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0920692392774 0.056905535591 162% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.