Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. Discuss both views with your opinion.
An individual’s outer appearance in terms of clothing is both important in his personal as well professional life. Presently, some people assert that formal and attractive attire has a great significance at the workplace. By contrast others believe that quality of work carries a greater value than appearance. Here I would like to account for both views with my own perception.
There are manifold points to support the former view. First and foremost, by requiring the workforce to dress smartly will give a professional impression. To justify, the clothing sense of any company directly reflects that the company takes their working standards seriously. Moreover, this will also enhance the qualitative work culture along with the positive attitudes among the workers. As a consequence, workforce is expected to be more confident and would have better working efficiency. What is more, wearing a formal or designer dress and to be good looking are the general requirements in various corporate houses where customers are in direct contact with the staff members. Hence, the worthiness of the wearing smart uniforms at work cannot be ignored.
On the flip side, numerous points can be mentioned to shore up the latter view. Initially, quality of work is considered to be the most prominent factor to boost the productivity of an organization. For example, hiring technically advanced and skillful professionals is a sure criterion for a company to achieve their success goals rather than laying unnecessary stress on their wardrobes. Moving further, it has been seen that multinational corporations such as Google and Microsoft give ample priority to working methods and skills as compared to outward appearance. Likewise Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook is well known to wear same styled casual tee and jeans in lieu of saving his precious time which may get wasted while choosing different and fancy clothes for work every day.
From my notion both aspects have their own significance. Undeniably, dressing sense may have a huge impact on the overall personality of an individual. However, I personally believe that in case of working sector, quality of work cannot be ignored at any cost as the performance of both the company as well as its employees is completely dependent on how the company functions.
To recapitulate, it can be stated that the attractive wardrobes at work may be lucrative but concerning more on qualitative working will surely encourage the professionalism at workplaces.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...ills as compared to outward appearance. Likewise Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Facebook is wel...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 300, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... as the performance of both the company as well as its employees is completely dependent o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, likewise, look, may, moreover, so, well, while, for example, such as, as well as, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31578947368 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02734691878 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 176.041082164 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591478696742 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5327516888 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.05 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.95 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 8.67935871743 196% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228277178976 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668840992334 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0563145222171 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127915601938 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600137792315 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.