Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
As compared to the past years, the behavior and approach of the organizations about the employees changed drastically. By this, some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly while others claim that the quality of work matters rather an appearance. I totally agree with the first statement but there are some more points are consider which I discuss above.
In one hand, the knowledge and experience in any field depend upon the grasping power of an employee. The working style and their consistency of doing work are emphasized upon how the employee has an idea of completing the task. For example, Generally, In the interviews, the employers asked trickiest and creative questions to know the employee working consideration, if they are a smart worker or a hard worker. To specify, the employees who are creative, different in thinking and ideas and have good skills to manage the projects timely benefit the companies overall growth. But, In the present era, only hustle for work it not the only consideration to test the capacity and behavior of the employee.
On the other hand, the well-dressed and mannered personality jobbers are more attractive to talk with at any company. To illustrate, the workers who are uninformed and have a formal outlook gain more respect, faith, and reliability from the customers. They have confidence and enough caliber to solve the problems or suggest ideas when they feel fresh, energetic and comfortable. However, it also shows the companies status and brand through the employee's behavior and personality coding as a dressing sense generalized by the customers. For example, Likewise, when you go to the showroom of BIBA, L.G or any other, the customer representative<span class="hiddenSuggestion" pre="the "></span> always wear a formal Pant-Shirt and hang an id card to show their employability. This gives an insight to the customers about company's reputation and presents as a trustable brand to buy products and if they get any problem, default, fraud or any type of issue than they directly come over to that particular shop or the sales representative to complain and solve the problem. Furthermore, it does not only create the positivity among employees but also it establishes a strong image of the company in the outside world.
In conclusion, I support that rather only improving the quality of work, organizations need to focus on employees development and on the other factors which can grow the overall efficiency of workers and Companies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...ment but there are some more points are consider which I discuss above. In one hand, ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'companies'' or 'company's'?
Suggestion: companies'; company's
...comfortable. However, it also shows the companies status and brand through the employees ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 447, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
... companies status and brand through the employees behavior and personality coding as a dr...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 601, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: G
... when you go to the showroom of BIBA, L.G or any other, the customer representati...
^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...of work, organizations need to focus on employees development and on the other factors wh...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, look, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 10.4138276553 259% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27093596059 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33452784214 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559113300493 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 662.4 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.0682049348 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.75 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18106647071 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059041309349 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568541061221 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121928606668 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524968630487 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.