Whether or not parents think computer games are better for children is widely debated with many parent claiming that computer games are good for children and they should be allowed to play more of them.
In my opinion this notion merit serious consideration and I will explain why in this essay with pertinent argument and example.
There are myriad of argument in favor of my stance. The most conspicuous one is that children always practice what they see and play with. Although, some computer games can be educational and at the same time very dangerous for children without supervision of their parent.
Another pivotal aspect of my argument is that children experiment through play unlike Adult that think of the dangers associated with what they watch and play with.
For instance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that children can become disobedient to their parent because of overly attached to computer game.
In view of the argument outline above, one can conclude that the impacts associated with computer games when children are not well monitor are indeed too great to ignore. Nevertheless, the benefit of that it may entails with computer games should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 2, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'Whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: Whether
Whether or not parents think computer games are better...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 93, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun parent seems to be countable; consider using: 'many parents'.
Suggestion: many parents
...ter for children is widely debated with many parent claiming that computer games are good f...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...stance underpinning the aforementioned, an empirical is that children can become disobedient...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 274, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... games should not be overlooked either.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, may, nevertheless, so, well, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 1615.20841683 63% => OK
No of words: 197.0 315.596192385 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15736040609 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 4.20363070211 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62626466642 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 176.041082164 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.568527918782 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 506.74238477 63% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4222166639 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.888888889 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.88888888889 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.454261018082 0.244688304435 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178947913996 0.084324248473 212% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172253141784 0.0667982634062 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233631171778 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.189242973008 0.056905535591 333% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 78.4519038076 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.