Some People believe that to be successful at a sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
<div class="jsx-843533192 page-text__text" style="box-sizing: border-box; outline: none; font-family: -apple-technique, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; position: relative; margin-top: 20px; color: rgb(28, 30, 41); white-space: pre-line; line-height: 2rem; font-size: 17px !important;"><div class="jsx-2704154727 highlights2" style="box-sizing: border-box; outline: none;"><div class="highlights2__highlight" style="box-sizing: border-box; outline: none; position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; color: transparent;">Sports play a pivotal role in people's lives. A host of citizens holds the assumption that being a fruitful cricketer, footballer, one's inherent forte is prime. However, others believe that becoming accustomed to do diligence can lead someone to stand at the apex position of sports' career. I believe that strenuous tasks provide the summit position of sports world.
There is a number of factors why some individuals claim congenital faculty is the principal job to be effectual in the sports career. Firstly, Sports likewise volleyball, badminton, hockey is such a game which can be obtained by inborn. As a result, if a person is futile to posses the prowess since birth, it is hardly feasible to have a fruition in games. For instance, in India, researchers demonstrated that nearly 23% boys were vain in a chess game because of lacking innate capability.
On the other hand, for some, it is not mandatory to have special brilliance for the advent of a prominent player. They expound that to become a successful player, indefatigable work as well as exercise are the prerequisite. Furthermore, tireless assiduity will lead a player to discover some new strategies to surmount those obstacles which hinder him to be venerable athletic. In addition to it, routinely practice will be conducive to become a glaring player of his coach what will promote his position. For example, Sachin Tendulkar, former worldwide esteemed cricketer, was the most successful cricketer in the world as he practiced regularly, approximately 16 hours per day.
To conclude, nature capability is a minimal fact to be a successful <div class="highlights2__highlight-item highlights2__highlight-item_warning" style="box-sizing: border-box; outline: none; display: inline; position: relative; z-index: 2; transition: all 400ms ease 0s; background: rgb(247, 236, 181);"><span style="box-sizing: border-box; outline: none; color: rgb(17, 17, 17);">player</span></div>r compared with assiduous persistence. I believe that industrious perseverance can bring the fruitful sports career.</div><div><br></div></div></div><div class="jsx-843533192 page-text__nav" style="box-sizing: border-box; outline: none; font-family: -apple-technique, BlinkMacSystemFont, "Segoe UI", Roboto, Oxygen, Ubuntu, Cantarell, "Fira Sans", "Droid Sans", "Helvetica Neue", sans-serif; color: rgb(17, 17, 17); font-size: 16px; white-space: normal;"></div>
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, likewise, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 10.4138276553 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2811.0 1615.20841683 174% => OK
No of words: 394.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 7.1345177665 5.12529762239 139% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.93585317004 2.80592935109 212% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 247.0 176.041082164 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626903553299 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 765.9 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 187.21027987 49.4020404114 379% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 187.4 106.682146367 176% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2666666667 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0845680651287 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0497616054913 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338736987311 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.067604497669 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294700275639 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 25.3 13.0946893788 193% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 24.37 12.4159519038 196% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.5 9.78957915832 220% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.