It is undeniably true that for several decades schooling has been made available to all students irrespective of any barriers. While few experts believe that higher learning should be provided only to a certain percentage of tutees, others are opposing this and advising to admit all learners at universities. In my opinion, every student has an equal right to attend graduation classes.
To embark upon, by allowing only top rankers to continue their studies have few advantages. First and foremost would be by effectively utilizing institution facilities top graders can bring either new innovative ideas or products which could change the world. For instance, world-renowned scientists educated came from top educational establishments. The second point worth related to the quality of teaching. To elaborate on it, governments do not have to invest in new colleges instead they can improve the existing establishments by not only raising standards of coaching but also providing sophisticated equipment.
Shifting towards the second school of thought, there myriad things that are in favor of this statement. The primary point to be highlighted is that education has been a basic necessity across the world for all human beings and no one would be forced to stop studying as per their grades. On top of it, due to the increased competition, a minimum degree would be required to be employable for any profession. Otherwise, the unemployment rate would skyrocket; as a result, the national economy would be collapsed.
To conclude, in my opinion, although there are few benefits by allowing merit candidates for higher education such as innovation, all undergraduates must have access to pursue graduation to make them more employable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'admitting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'advise' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: admitting
..., others are opposing this and advising to admit all learners at universities. In my opi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'innovative'.
Suggestion: innovative
...facilities top graders can bring either new innovative ideas or products which could change th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 513, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he national economy would be collapsed. To conclude, in my opinion, although the...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, while, for instance, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3795620438 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06803004454 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653284671533 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.373398634 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.384615385 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234383224806 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688302861491 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526274855242 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128207231854 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06063281339 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.15 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.