Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the world nowadays, there is a serious problem in some countries that the traffic jam more and more increase. It is argued that money should be spent on constructing train systems and subway lines to discount traffic troubles instead of widening and upgrading more roads. In my point of view, i support with those who believe the better way to improve traffic crowding is using public transport.
On the one hand, there are some clear reasons why building and boost streets is good for the bettering of traffic jam. Firstly, in some countries the road systems are often small and narrow, people travel by cars will be very difficult to move , some of them come from the outskirt and go to the center to work, so establish a reasonable road system is very important . Secondly, when constructing more roads and dividing into different types of vehicle, the traffic jam will be decline noticeably. For example, highways only allow four-wheel vehicles to be traveled, so other vehicles can use another roads to move.
On the other hand, we are living in an increasingly society, technology and machinery are getting more and more advanced, and transportation is not an exception. Train systems and subways lines are the evidences for the advance of human's inventions and they worth to be invested to get better the traffic problems. First of all, we can go to work more quickly because of the speed of these public transports, they have their own road system so travel is more convenient . The second is our population is goes up dramatically, this lead to using vehicles rise more, so It is worrying about the lack of space to expand roads, especially in the cities, public transport will be a suitable choice for commuters and students. Finally, traffic jam may be cause a lot of unfortunate accidents. For example, in Vietnam , there are many accidents related to traffic everyday, so replace travelling by cars or motorbikes by trains or subway can be more safety .
In conclusion, although decreasing the traffic congestion by widening roads is the vigorous idea, using money to improve train systems, subways in particular and other public transport in general is the optimization methods.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a serious problem in some countries that the traffic jam more and more increase. ...
^^
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...rading more roads. In my point of view, i support with those who believe the bett...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c crowding is using public transport. On the one hand, there are some clear...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...l by cars will be very difficult to move , some of them come from the outskirt and...
^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...reasonable road system is very important . Secondly, when constructing more roads ...
^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... example, highways only allow four-wheel vehicles to be traveled, so other vehicl...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...icles can use another roads to move. On the other hand, we are living in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('increasingly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('society') instead of another adjective.
... On the other hand, we are living in an increasingly society, technology and machinery are getting m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 474, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...road system so travel is more convenient . The second is our population is goes up...
^^
Line 9, column 751, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
... and students. Finally, traffic jam may be cause a lot of unfortunate accidents. For exa...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 815, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...unate accidents. For example, in Vietnam , there are many accidents related to tra...
^^
Line 9, column 862, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...e are many accidents related to traffic everyday, so replace travelling by cars or motor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 954, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s by trains or subway can be more safety . In conclusion, although decreas...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ins or subway can be more safety . In conclusion, although decreasing the t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, in general, in particular, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 13.1623246493 198% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1838.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99456521739 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72096962964 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.3700559963 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.285714286 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 5.01903807615 279% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249796590056 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0971102684204 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481057298353 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170224543461 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522851329778 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.