Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
It has been considered that the distribution of data about science, business and academic world is good regardless of its quantity. At the same time, however, some said that there is a great deal of essential type information that cannot be shared freely with others. From my perspective, the type of information should be taken into consideration seriously in some cases, before distributing it directly to others.
The global spread of information over the world can be advantageous for a number of reasons. Firstly, every country will have the access to possess modern invention. For instance, converting the sunlight into energy was an unattainable process for many countries, while it had been already devised by western countries and used for practical purposes. Today, solar energy is being used throughout the world as an alternative type of fuel to curb the environmental pollution. Secondly, sharing information can enhance academic performance in some countries where the literacy rate is so poor to compare with others. Exchanging information on multiple areas among the countries broadens people’s horizon, consequently, the number of intellectual people will increase.
Conversely, there may be drawbacks in distributing information since nobody knows the exact purposes of others. Some information about science may turn into a pattern of lethal weapon if it is owned by vicious aimed people, such as atomic bomb in 1945 which devastated millions of lives in Nagasaki and Hiroshima, whereas it was invented for the development of human lifestyle and world for the long term. Furthermore, countries will disclose their inside secrets to others without being aware of them. Having viable information about a country is a possible way to take an initiative to commence fight for people, whose intent is conquer the country.
People should consider the type of information carefully although it surely brings benefits. In my view, sharing information is beneficial as long as it will not pose serious problems to the world and human life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'conquered'.
Suggestion: conquered
...mence fight for people, whose intent is conquer the country. People should consider...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., whose intent is conquer the country. People should consider the type of infor...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, whereas, while, for instance, such as, in my view, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39628482972 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97552696162 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59133126935 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5887998145 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.2 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9333333333 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249598578771 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0870984584953 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505228250132 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16378585745 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341209221708 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.