Some people believe that in order to improve educational quality, we should encourage students to make comments or even criticism on their teachers, but others think it will lead to the loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
In some schools, students are allowed to comment on or even criticize their teachers. However, the effect of this practice is a topic of debate.
According to some people, allowing students to criticize their teachers can motivate the teachers to improve their work because the teachers’ work would be supervised by the students and the school board. The teachers can discover the deficiency in their teaching and correct it in time. If no one points out the teachers’ mistakes, the teachers may slack off. In addition, making comments on their teachers can develop students’ ability of independent thinking, which is an important factor in their growth. Students with such a quality are more likely to make innovation in their study and work. By contrast, those who follow other people blindly may be restricted in their imagination and creativity.
However, it is argued that if students are permitted to criticize their teachers, they may lose their respect for their teachers. The teachers may feel frustrated because their authority is challenged by the students. This would make it difficult for them to maintain the discipline in the classroom. Some students may take this chance to express their dissatisfaction for their teachers, as teenagers usually lack the ability to judge right from wrong.
In my view, encouraging students and teachers to have more interaction is a good way to improve the quality of education. It is not right to ban students from giving their opinions, even though sometimes they disagree with their teachers. However, the school and teachers should also try to guide them to do this properly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, in addition, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20377358491 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76319707928 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524528301887 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.3330952373 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9333333333 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6666666667 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318440762512 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11507526999 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621810129473 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201135018695 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306253626752 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 78.4519038076 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.