The university has provided students who are going to enter university with two summer vocation programs. Which one do you think is better for students?
1) Take some college courses in advance. e.g. some courses that are related to students' major.
2) Visit some history museums or historical relics.
Students always feel confused before they go to university. And the university offers two programs. I consider that the best way to reduce it is taking some major courses in advance.
Studying the major courses will help students understand their own specialties and adapt their university study life fast. It is comment that many students do not know what their major study. And they also need a long time study to know it. It will waste too much time. So to avoid this situation, student can study some major to learn about what they will study in future. For example, one student major in electrical engineering and the automatization specialty, he usually does not know what the specialty is and he will study. And the university always uses the first year to teach him what electrical engineering and the automatization is. It will waste a half year. It is not so favorable. So the better way is having the classes in advance.
Studying the major courses will help students plan their own college study life. It is important for a freshman. If freshmen can plan their study life, they will have a relaxing life. And if they have clear goals, nothing can tempt them, such as the works of students union. For example, if they take part in the students union blindly, they can balance with the study and works. And they cannot get anything in the end. So freshmen should plan their study life well.
To sum up, it is better for students to study some major courses in advance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...jor to learn about what they will study in future. For example, one student major in elec...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, well, for example, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.0286738351 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 52.1666666667 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1229.0 1977.66487455 62% => OK
No of words: 261.0 407.700716846 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70881226054 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.48103885553 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42035233593 2.67179642975 91% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 212.727598566 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475095785441 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 375.3 618.680645161 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.94265232975 20% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9831835208 48.9658058833 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.5238095238 100.406767564 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.4285714286 20.6045352989 60% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.45110844103 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266860639342 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087008631163 0.076458572812 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.088693904172 0.0737576698707 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237645483429 0.150856017488 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925299178839 0.0645574589148 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.0 11.7677419355 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 58.1214874552 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.15 10.9000537634 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.47 8.01818996416 81% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 86.8835125448 43% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.