Some people believe that reading stories from a book is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is thought by some people that reading books brings about a range of benefits rather than watching TV and playing computer games. I am convinced that watching TV also play an important role for children’s development.
It is undeniable that books are instrumental for children to enhance how to use language effectively. On the one hand, children spend their time on reading books, which may help them improve their language competencies. For example, through the fairy tales, a book which is not written in mother tongue leads to a strong language base referring to understanding vocabulary and comprehending language in various contexts. On the other hand, interesting stories are factors to motivate them for their further study, because they are able to use the language from the books to employ in their real lives on a daily basis. Additionally, their communication wiil be improved significantly based on practice with their peers.
However, the contributions of watching TV and playing computers games are necessary for children’s creativeness and imagination. In fact, songs and TV programs for children are a part to encourage children on creative language, and answer questions from adults cleverly. For instance, in Viet Nam, many children prefer watching “Nhanh Nhu Chop” which is a channel for kids. Through this show, children know how to answer the quizzes intelligent ways, which can help them more mature. In addition, educating children via TV show with vivid motions help them remember lessons longer.
In conclusion, in spite of reading books is really important for children’s grow, waching TV and playing computer games are more useful for them as opposed to their mental development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 583, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ions help them remember lessons longer. In conclusion, in spite of reading books...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, really, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in spite of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 273.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34432234432 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92554542459 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578754578755 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5496515478 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.230769231 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3846153846 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326895847165 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130785992281 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.097321654337 0.0667982634062 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233527356935 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0885366019829 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.