Many people argue that it is better for children to read books than to watch television or play electronic games on computers. While there are some benefits to allowing youngsters to watch televised productions and play virtual games on computers, I maintain that reading books does wonder for children's imagination development and their long-term concentration in the long run.
On the one hand, the idea of letting children watch broadcast programs and play computer games is beneficial to some extent. First and foremost, these activities offer children an effective way of entertaining in their spare time. For instance, they can watch their favorite cartoons and channels for kids on television or play their favorite computer games to unwind after a long day at school. Moreover, playing electronic games can also help enhance brain work among children. This is due to the fact that these games require thinking or even clever tactics to win; therefore, children need to make use of their critical thinking abilities and problem-solving skills during the training period as well as real matches to master the games.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why acknowledging stories through reading books is better for children. The first reason is that reading these stories will help boost children’s imagination. In order to comprehend the contents of a story, youngsters need to use their imaginative power to depict the whole scene in their minds. Moreover, the free-distraction environment that reading books offer should not be ignored. This is because when reading books, children need to concentrate on the stories significantly to understand the plots. Consequently, this will help children to ameliorate their prolonged concentration, leading to greater reading efficiency.
In conclusion, while some claim that watching television broadcasts and playing electronic games will take a role as an effective recreational measure and facilitate children’s brain productivity, I contend it is better for children to read books in their free time due to its promotion of imagination abilities and extensive concentration in youngsters. In my view, it would be a better option for children to perform all these activities to develop comprehensively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45480225989 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08264580537 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 575.1 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.1476768326 49.4020404114 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.733333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.26666666667 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346621474805 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134525556424 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979111668904 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234893853655 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560391200549 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.