Some people believe that smart phones are destroying social interaction today .To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that smartphones destroyed social Interaction between individuals and made them isolated. However, I partly agree with this statement.
On the one hand, cellphones brought us closer to each other. There are no barriers when it comes to doing meetings. In other words due to the technological revolution phones are equipped with special applications, therefore, everyone can be connected to their close ones if they wish so. As an example, due to covid-19 and lockdown whole society was isolated from outside world, hence, people started organizing online meetings in social platform «Zoom» in order to stay connected. Moreover, automated facilities in apps created in order to make individuals closer to their old and new friends. To clarify programmed applications select data while monitoring consumers` actions. For instance, Instagram, facebook automatically connect users with people from their contact numbers.
On the flip side, there negative correlation between using mobile phone and being socially active. First of all, social applications encourage users to gain a large number of followers who are strangers not friends. As a result, they feel emotional loneliness, nevertheless, they have virtual friends. For example apps like Tik tok, instagram created in order to gather more virtual friends. Besides, in our modern world individuals prefer talking online rather than making tangible conversation. To put it simply, in order to save extra money and time it is more effective to chatting or meeting online, however this phenomenon make people isolated. In addition, latest pandemic made this situation even worse.
In conclusion, the use of smart phone in an efficient way can enhance somebody's social interaction skills but it might also have adverse effect if used in excess
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...al applications encourage users to gain a large number of followers who are strangers not friends...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 186, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ers to gain a large number of followers who are strangers not friends. As a result, the...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 663, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
...omenon make people isolated. In addition, latest pandemic made this situation even worse...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... In conclusion, the use of smart phone in an efficient way can enhance somebodys social interactio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1544.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53405017921 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87352389127 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.695340501792 0.561755894193 124% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.6166389402 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8235294118 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.4117647059 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1176470588 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15895616715 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.043955924022 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584029874522 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117593557404 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680859110028 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.