Some people believe that smart phones are destroying social interaction today .To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technology has become an integral part of our lifestyle now. It is almost impossible to get through a day without using a smart phone. The time spent on a smart phone can be 9-10 hours a day. But I disagree to a certain extent that these smart phones are destroying social interaction today.
To begin with, These smart phones provides platform to interact with people virtually, there are multiple applications developed to provide a laudable experience of being connected across the world. In the times like these, where the world is going through a pandemic, being able to communicate and having virtual presence is important. Also, while conducting online lectures , meetings or even parties over a video call , smart phones are used.
Furthermore, These smart phones does not only help to stay connected with the people we know but also helps us meet and socialize with new people. These socializing experience help people to make friends , find a job and meet people who share common interests. As a result it helps improve the social interactions.
However, Sometimes these virtual socializations might effect the physical interaction with the people around. Adding to it, socializing on a virtual platform provides a virtual wall , so communication virtually on a smart phone does not ensure the ability to interact in physical world. This ca be resolved by limiting the use of smart phones.
To conclude, the use of smart phone in an efficient way can enhance somebody's social interaction skills but it might also have adverse effect if used in excess.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 376, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
.... Also, while conducting online lectures , meetings or even parties over a video c...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...etings or even parties over a video call , smart phones are used. Furthermore, ...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...g experience help people to make friends , find a job and meet people who share co...
^^
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...meet people who share common interests. As a result it helps improve the social in...
^^
Line 7, column 55, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
...imes these virtual socializations might effect the physical interaction with the peopl...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 182, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...virtual platform provides a virtual wall , so communication virtually on a smart p...
^^
Line 9, column 37, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an efficient way" with adverb for "efficient"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... To conclude, the use of smart phone in an efficient way can enhance somebodys social interactio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14007782101 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77630559482 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603112840467 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0658357624 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3571428571 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3571428571 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285019736884 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113037010742 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113676778956 0.0667982634062 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166566336624 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667353416005 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.